27 August 2026
The Code-Share Era: Why Sport's Next Growth Market Is Someone Else's Audience
Bayern Munich and the NHL just signed a partnership with no disclosed money in it. That is exactly what makes it interesting.
Read article →Strategy
Why a century of accumulated meaning is becoming football’s scarcest commercial asset, and how one club is building that asset from scratch.
Data as of August 2026. Sources are listed at the end of this article.
For most of the past two decades, football’s commercial modernization has followed a remarkably consistent formula. Clubs expanded premium hospitality, international sponsorship, digital content, retail, licensing, membership programs and non-matchday stadium use. The model worked. The 20 highest-revenue clubs in world football generated a record €12.4 billion in 2024/25, up 11 percent in a single year, and their combined commercial income reached €5.3 billion, exceeding broadcasting for a third consecutive season.
But the headline number is not the interesting part.
The interesting part is where the growth is coming from. An increasing share of football’s commercial revenue is being generated by assets that sit outside the ninety minutes: the stadium, the city, the heritage, the supporter culture, the visual identity, the institutional story. Broadcasting money is distributed through competition structures and rises and falls with sporting results. Commercial revenue behaves differently. It depends on a club’s ability to convert recognition, attachment and cultural relevance into recurring economic value.
And that ability is now separating Europe’s largest clubs from everyone else.
Commercial income accounts for 48 percent of revenue among the top ten clubs in Deloitte’s Football Money League, averaging €265 million per club. Among clubs ranked 11th to 20th, the share is 32 percent. Fifteen years ago there was no gap at all: Deloitte’s club-by-club data for 2009/10 implies commercial shares of roughly 31 percent for the top ten and 33 percent for the next ten.
Europe’s leading clubs have not merely grown larger. They have built a different revenue architecture. They monetize the institution itself, not just the football it produces.
Which raises the strategic question this article is about: if commercial differentiation matters more as football’s business models converge, can history and identity function as competitive economic assets rather than constraints on modernization?
The evidence says yes. But only where identity is translated rather than diluted. And, as one club on an Italian lake is currently demonstrating, the logic may even run in reverse.
€12.4 billion: combined revenue of the Money League top 20 in 2024/25, with commercial income exceeding broadcast for the third straight season
48% vs 32%: commercial share of revenue for the top ten Money League clubs versus clubs ranked 11 to 20. In 2009/10 the two groups were level
€51 million: Athletic Club’s commercial revenue in 2024/25, nearly triple the €17.8 million of 2021/22, built on the most restrictive squad policy in Europe
354,000: Benfica’s active members at the end of June 2025, generating a record €21.5 million in membership fees alone
€29.2 million: capital raised by St. Pauli’s cooperative from 22,623 supporters to take majority ownership of the Millerntor stadium company
140,000: volunteer working hours contributed by more than 2,300 Union Berlin fans to rebuild their own stadium
€53,000 to €10 million: Como 1907’s merchandising revenue before and after its owners began building the club as a global destination brand
Real Madrid, first in the Money League at €1.161 billion and the only club to clear €1 billion two years running, offers the clearest top-end example of what translation means.
The stadium is still officially the Santiago Bernabéu, the name adopted in January 1955 in honor of the president who built Real Madrid into a modern European institution. But the commercial presentation of the redeveloped venue increasingly revolves around a shorter formulation: the Bernabéu. The club runs a dedicated venue platform under that name, and the Tour Bernabéu operates 363 days a year.
The distinction looks cosmetic. It is not. “Santiago Bernabéu” is the formal name of a historic football ground. “Bernabéu” functions as a global commercial property across hospitality, tourism, events, retail and entertainment. The heritage has not been erased; its expression has been simplified so it can travel.
The scale of the bet is instructive. Real Madrid has invested a cumulative €1.347 billion in the redevelopment, converting a matchday venue into a year-round asset. The early returns are visible: matchday revenue doubled to €248 million in 2023/24 as the renovation completed, recurring stadium operations grew another 38 percent in 2024/25, Taylor Swift opened the concert era in May 2024, and in November 2025 the Bernabéu hosted the NFL’s first regular-season game in Spain.
Yet the platform this entire strategy rests on is a name and an institution created in the middle of the twentieth century. The value of the new model lies not in replacing tradition but in making it commercially legible.
Professional football has become far better at commercial execution, and that progress has produced a side effect: convergence. Most major clubs now sell broadly the same categories of product. Premium seating, hospitality, sponsorship tiers, online retail, membership, digital content, international activations, stadium experiences.
When products standardize, scale wins. A club with hundreds of millions of followers and annual Champions League visibility will always sell generic football inventory better than a club in a smaller market. For mid-sized and traditional clubs, imitating the commercial structure of a superclub mostly produces a smaller version of the same proposition.
Their stronger opportunity lies in the one asset that cannot be standardized.
Football clubs hold a type of intangible capital that is extraordinarily difficult to manufacture: decades of accumulated meaning connecting a team to a place, a community and a set of rituals. Conventional consumer businesses spend fortunes trying to create differentiation, loyalty and emotional association. Many football clubs inherited all three generations ago.
The commercial challenge is not to protect that identity as a museum piece. It is to identify which elements of it can generate economic value without weakening the relationship that created the value in the first place.
Across Europe, a set of clubs has been quietly proving that this works, each monetizing a different dimension of identity.
On paper, Athletic Club’s recruitment philosophy is a handicap. Since 1912 the club has fielded only players born or developed in the Basque Country, voluntarily excluding almost the entire global talent market.
Commercially, that limitation has become the product.
Athletic’s “Unique in the World” positioning does not apologize for the policy. It elevates it into the central narrative of the institution, and the club has built its commercial strategy around it under the AC Aurrera 2023-2026 plan. The results are striking: commercial revenue grew from €17.8 million in 2021/22 to €36.4 million in 2023/24 to €51 million in 2024/25, nearly tripling in three seasons.
The sporting platform helped, and it is worth being precise about it: the 2024 Copa del Rey, the club’s first since 1984, a Europa League semifinal run in 2024/25 with San Mamés hosting that season’s final, and a return to the Champions League in 2025/26 after finishing fourth in La Liga. San Mamés ran at roughly 91 percent of capacity across the league season.
But the deeper point is what Athletic did not do. It did not grow by moving away from the characteristic that makes it unusual. It grew by packaging, communicating and monetizing that characteristic better. Athletic cannot compete with Real Madrid on reach. It occupies a commercial position Real Madrid cannot credibly imitate.
In a homogenizing market, that is worth €51 million a year and climbing.
Benfica monetizes a different dimension: affiliation itself.
At the end of June 2025 the club’s active membership passed 350,000 for the first time, at roughly 354,000, having added more than 27,000 members in a single year; the 400,000th membership card in the club’s history was issued in February 2025. Annual membership fees reached a record €21.5 million, alongside record merchandising of €20.5 million. Benfica has held the Guinness World Record for the most paid-up club members since it was first certified in 2006.
The strategic value of membership income is easy to underestimate. It is not just another commercial line. It is recurring revenue tied to affiliation with the institution rather than to any specific sporting outcome. A supporter does not need Benfica to reach a Champions League semifinal to remain a member.
That is what makes identity economically powerful: it converts emotion into a more stable form of cash flow. Sporting results will always move a club’s finances, but the stronger the institutional relationship, the larger the share of revenue that survives a weak season. Benfica is, in effect, monetizing belonging, and belonging does not relegate.
St. Pauli has taken the logic one step further than anyone: its supporter identity has generated not just consumption but financing.
The Hamburg club passed 50,000 members in July 2025, reaching 52,357, more than double the sub-20,000 figure of a decade earlier, and stood above 55,000 by early 2026. More remarkable is what those members did next. Through the cooperative launched in late 2024, 22,623 supporters bought €29.2 million of shares, primarily so the cooperative could take majority ownership of the Millerntor stadium operating company.
Read that as a business proposition. The club did not persuade supporters to buy another shirt or a dearer ticket. It persuaded more than twenty-two thousand people to provide capital, because participation itself was consistent with what they believe St. Pauli represents. Almost no conventional consumer brand has customers willing to finance infrastructure as an expression of their relationship with the organization.
That is identity operating as a balance-sheet instrument.
Union Berlin monetizes what most modern stadium strategies eliminate: scarcity and roughness.
The Alte Försterei holds 22,012, of whom more than 18,000 stand. When it needed rebuilding in 2008 and 2009, over 2,300 supporters contributed roughly 140,000 volunteer working hours to the construction, and from 2011 fans bought tens of thousands of shares in the stadium operating company. The venue is not valuable because it is large or technologically advanced. It is valuable because nobody else has one.
As Union has grown, that has created a real strategic tension: more capacity and more hospitality mean more revenue, but expansion risks diluting the very scarcity that makes the experience worth traveling for. Luxury brands manage the same trade-off. In football the stakes are higher, because supporter culture is not something the organization fully controls. Union’s discipline in calibrating growth, rather than maximizing it, is itself a commercial strategy.
VfB Stuttgart proves that identity need not be countercultural or romantic to be bankable. Its identity is regional and industrial.
The club sits at the center of one of Europe’s most significant economic regions and has spent decades building relationships across the commercial ecosystem of Baden-Württemberg. As sporting results returned, that regional embeddedness converted into numbers at scale: fiscal 2025 revenue of €383.6 million, a €22.5 million post-tax profit, membership around 135,000 and a record 156,500 shirts sold.
The lesson generalizes. Identity can be industrial, regional, urban, political or cultural. What matters is that it is specific. Specificity is what sponsors cannot buy from anyone else.
| Club | Identity asset | Mechanism | Proof point, 2024/25-2025/26 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Real Madrid | Heritage venue | Year-round stadium economy | Matchday doubled to €248M after the €1.35B Bernabéu rebuild |
| Athletic Club | Unique sporting philosophy | Positioning and premium partnerships | Commercial revenue €17.8M to €51M in three seasons |
| Benfica | Mass belonging | Recurring membership income | ~354,000 active members, record €21.5M in fees |
| St. Pauli | Cultural conviction | Supporter capital | €29.2M raised from 22,623 members for the Millerntor |
| Union Berlin | Scarcity | Demand exceeding deliberately limited supply | 22,012 capacity, fan-built, perpetually full |
| VfB Stuttgart | Regional economy | Deep local commercial ecosystem | €383.6M revenue, €22.5M profit in fiscal 2025 |
Every club above inherited its identity and learned to monetize it. The most instructive current experiment in football runs the other way. Como 1907 is testing whether identity can be composed deliberately, and at speed.
The starting point could hardly have been smaller. SENT Entertainment, the vehicle of Indonesia’s Hartono family, whose combined wealth of around $38.5 billion makes them comfortably the wealthiest owners in Serie A, acquired the club in April 2019 for a reported fee of around €800,000, two years after a bankruptcy had sent it to the fourth tier. What followed was one of the most coherent club-building projects in Europe: Serie C by 2021, Serie A by 2024 after a first top-flight absence of two decades, tenth place in the first season back, fourth place in 2025/26, and a Champions League debut in 2026/27, the first European qualification in the club’s 119-year history.
The sporting project is serious and seriously resourced. Cesc Fàbregas arrived as a player and minority shareholder in 2022, became permanent head coach in 2024 and has stayed through interest from bigger names. Thierry Henry holds a stake. The club retained Nico Paz in 2026 through a reported €60 million arrangement with Real Madrid rather than lose him to a buy-back clause, and its €94 million net spend in summer 2025 was the highest in Serie A.
But the commercial design is what makes Como relevant to this article. The ownership treats Lake Como itself as the master brand and the club as the way the world participates in it. Mirwan Suwarso, the executive who runs the project, states the ambition openly: “We shouldn’t be a football team: we should be a sports tourism destination,” with a declared goal of building a $1 billion group by 2038. The numbers are moving his way. Merchandising has grown from €53,000 to €10 million under the current ownership. Roughly 40 percent of ticket revenue comes from international buyers. Uber sits on the front of the shirt. The 13,000-capacity Sinigaglia sells out, premium matchday products reach four figures, and a Populous-designed redevelopment will take the lakeside stadium toward 15,000 to 20,000 seats. The club even created its own summer property, the Como Cup, beating Ajax in the inaugural 2025 final in front of visiting supporters from three continents.
Como is doing knowingly what historic clubs do by inheritance: attaching football to a place, an aesthetic and a story, then converting that attachment into revenue. The difference is direction. Athletic translates a century of accumulated meaning forward; Como is accumulating meaning in real time, with European nights, a distinctive playing identity and a global audience arriving at once. The open task, which the ownership itself acknowledges in its stadium and community planning, is to keep deepening the local roots beneath the global brand, because permanence is what turns a destination into an institution.
For the wider industry, Como matters because it demonstrates the thesis from the opposite side: identity is so commercially valuable that the most sophisticated new money in football is building one on purpose.
The most interesting implications sit outside the Money League entirely, in the large category of clubs whose cultural relevance exceeds their commercial scale.
Napoli cannot reproduce Real Madrid’s global reach, but its relationship with Naples extends naturally into fashion, tourism and lifestyle. Celtic’s bond with Glasgow and the Irish diaspora creates an international community whose value no domestic attendance figure captures. Boca Juniors owns one of the most recognizable combinations of neighborhood, stadium and visual identity in world sport.
And then there are the clubs where the gap between cultural relevance and commercial capture is widest, which is another way of saying: where the unrealized value sits.
FC Zürich is a useful example. It operates in a small media market and a fraction of the revenue environment of England, Spain or Germany, yet it drew an average of more than 15,000 spectators per league match in 2024/25 at the Letzigrund and represents Switzerland’s largest city. The tempting move would be to borrow Zurich’s international reputation for wealth and go premium. That would confuse the economic profile of the city with the cultural identity of the club. FCZ’s actual territory is more distinctive: urban Zurich, the Letzigrund, neighborhood culture, design, music, youth, local football history, and a supporter identity that deliberately contrasts with the city’s polished global image. Those are exactly the raw materials that Athletic, St. Pauli and Union turned into revenue, and they could support extensions in apparel, local design, culture, women’s football, events and carefully selected partnerships.
The point is not that a club like FCZ has captured that value. The point is that it has not, and that identity-led growth offers such clubs a more credible path than assembling a miniature copy of a superclub’s commercial machinery.
These cases share a discipline that is easy to miss: none of them confuses identity with branding.
Branding is what an organization communicates. Identity is what stakeholders believe the organization fundamentally is. A club can commission a new crest, a campaign or a creative agency in a quarter. It cannot manufacture a century of supporter memory, and supporters can tell the difference immediately.
That is why some commercial initiatives strengthen a club while others corrode it. A heritage collection built on genuine visual history deepens affinity; a generic lifestyle collaboration merely places a crest on an unrelated product. A sensitive stadium development grows revenue while preserving atmosphere; an over-sanitized one raises short-term yield while draining the experience that created demand. The Bernabéu works precisely because the shortened name still carries the full historical association underneath it. Empty the association and the word loses its value.
The commercial value of identity, in other words, depends entirely on the credibility of the connection between the new product and the existing institution.
For a decade, football’s commercial conversation has been dominated by reach: followers, exposure, global fan estimates, sponsorship impressions. Reach still matters. But it does not measure the quality of the relationship, and the quality of the relationship is where the money now is.
A club with ten million lightly engaged followers can be worth less, commercially, than a club with two million supporters who attend, renew, repurchase, travel and stay attached across generations. The next phase of football commercialization is about conversion, and conversion demands different metrics: commercial revenue per supporter, membership penetration, merchandise spend per member, sponsor renewal rates, repeat purchase, stadium utilization, international retail intensity, engagement relative to audience size.
The single most revealing metric may be commercial resilience across sporting cycles. If commercial revenue rises only when the club qualifies for Europe, the club is monetizing sporting success. If it keeps growing through weaker seasons, the club is monetizing the institution. Benfica’s fee income, Athletic’s commercial curve and Stuttgart’s regional ecosystem all point the same way.
The timing makes this urgent rather than merely interesting. The European football market passed €40 billion for the first time in 2024/25, but Deloitte’s own outlook now points to slowing growth, with some markets approaching a plateau. When the tide stops rising, the clubs that keep growing will be the ones that convert attachment better, not the ones that simply reach further.
There is a natural limit, and the best identity-led clubs manage to it.
Identity is not infinitely monetizable, because its value rests on authenticity and scarcity. Once every historic reference becomes a product, every tradition becomes content and every symbol becomes sponsorship inventory, the club starts consuming the asset it is trying to monetize. Some elements of identity are economically valuable precisely because they stay outside the commercial sphere.
The strategic skill is distinguishing monetization that reinforces attachment from monetization that merely extracts from it. St. Pauli’s cooperative reinforced attachment; its members became owners. Union’s restraint on capacity reinforces scarcity. The clubs that understand the boundary expand commercially while strengthening identity. The clubs that do not generate a few strong quarters while quietly weakening the only asset their differentiation depends on.
Football spent years treating commercial modernization and tradition as opposing forces, assuming growth required clubs to become more global, more polished and less particular.
The evidence now points the other way. Athletic tripled commercial revenue by making its exceptional philosophy more visible, not less. Benfica converts belonging into €21.5 million of recurring fees. St. Pauli’s culture proved strong enough to raise capital, not just consumption. Union monetizes scarcity, Stuttgart monetizes geography, and Real Madrid turned a name from 1955 into the platform for a €1.35 billion entertainment venue. Como, coming from the opposite direction, is spending serious capital to construct exactly the kind of place-based identity the others inherited, because its owners recognize it as the foundation everything else compounds on.
The advantage, then, is not tradition by itself. Plenty of historic clubs remain commercially weak. The advantage is the ability to identify which elements of history, geography and supporter culture can be translated into modern economic value without stripping them of what made them valuable.
That ability will matter more every year, because everything else in football’s commercial toolkit is becoming easier to copy. Stadium technology can be purchased. CRM systems can be installed. Hospitality concepts, content formats and sponsorship inventories converge by the season.
What cannot be bought on the open market is accumulated meaning between a club, its supporters and its place. Some clubs inherited it. One is building it in plain sight. Either way, it is the scarcest asset in the game, and increasingly it is the product.
The strategic question for traditional clubs is no longer whether to choose between heritage and growth. It is whether they understand that the heritage is one of the principal reasons growth is possible.
A note on process: AI tools were used to support parts of the research, data visualisation and editorial refinement of this article. The analysis draws on the studies and sources listed below.
Sources: Deloitte Football Money League 2026 (2024/25 figures) and Deloitte press materials; Deloitte Football Money League 2011 (2009/10 club-by-club data); Deloitte Annual Review of Football Finance 2026; Real Madrid 2024/25 financial results and Bernabéu venue communications; Athletic Club accounts via 2Playbook and SportBusiness, and the club’s “Unique in the World” platform; SL Benfica 2024/25 accounts and official communications; Guinness World Records; FC St. Pauli membership and cooperative announcements (FCSP eG results, May 2025); Union Berlin and Alte Försterei stadium communications; VfB Stuttgart fiscal 2025 results; Transfermarkt attendance data for FC Zürich; Como 1907 reporting via SportsPro (Mirwan Suwarso interview), Sports Illustrated, Bloomberg, Football Italia and official club and league records; Populous stadium redevelopment announcement; contemporaneous transfer reporting on Como’s 2024-2026 windows.
A. Strulak writes on sports business, commercial strategy and the economics of rights. Vinciamo Sports, Sport. Reimagined.
More Insight
Bayern Munich and the NHL just signed a partnership with no disclosed money in it. That is exactly what makes it interesting.
Read article →Talent is rarely the scarce resource in sport. The system capable of finding, developing and retaining it usually is.
Read article →Why some fixtures carry a weight the league table cannot explain, and how sport turns that emotion into economic value.
Read article →