27 August 2026
The Code-Share Era: Why Sport's Next Growth Market Is Someone Else's Audience
Bayern Munich and the NHL just signed a partnership with no disclosed money in it. That is exactly what makes it interesting.
Read article →Strategy
Italy’s failure to qualify for consecutive World Cups is easy to interpret in familiar ways. It can be framed as a sporting underperformance, a tactical stagnation, or the delayed consequence of structural issues long discussed within Italian football. In that reading, the story is ultimately about results: a strong football nation experiencing an extended competitive dip.
But that interpretation, while not wrong, is incomplete. It treats Italy as a team that has lost matches, rather than as something broader that has lost visibility. It assumes continuity where there may, in fact, be rupture.
What has happened to Italy national football team over the past twelve years is not simply a sequence of failed qualification campaigns. It is a prolonged absence from the most important stage in its category. And when that absence is viewed through a business lens, it begins to resemble something more consequential than underperformance.
It begins to look like a breakdown in brand presence.
To understand why that distinction matters, it helps to consider the role of the FIFA World Cup in the global football economy. The tournament is not only a competition. It is the single most powerful moment of audience aggregation in the sport: a concentrated period in which narratives are built, identities are reinforced, and global attention is captured at unmatched scale.
For participating nations, the World Cup functions as a form of cyclical brand activation. Every four years, teams are reintroduced to new audiences, re-experienced by existing supporters, and recontextualised within the contemporary landscape of the sport. Success amplifies that effect, but even participation alone maintains relevance.
Italy has not participated since 2014.
From a purely sporting perspective, that is a statistical anomaly for a nation of its pedigree. From a brand perspective, it is something more unusual: a legacy entity missing multiple consecutive cycles of its primary exposure event.
In most industries, this would be equivalent to a premium brand failing to appear in its core market for over a decade. The issue would not only be lost revenue during that period. It would be the gradual erosion of relevance that occurs when a brand is no longer experienced in real time.
Italy remains one of football’s most recognisable identities. Names such as Roberto Baggio, Paolo Maldini and Fabio Cannavaro continue to anchor its mythology, while the 2006 World Cup victory remains a defining reference point in the sport’s modern history.
That historical capital matters. It sustains emotional attachment and preserves a sense of identity even during periods of decline. But it also creates a subtle risk.
Brands do not exist only in memory. They exist through repeated exposure.
In marketing terms, awareness is not a static asset. It is continuously reinforced through presence. When that presence disappears, memory begins to function differently. It shifts from something that supports ongoing relevance to something that replaces it.
Italy is now in that transition.
For older audiences, the brand remains vivid because it is anchored in lived experience. For younger audiences, however, Italy is increasingly encountered as a historical reference rather than a contemporary force. A supporter who began following football in the past decade has never seen Italy play a knockout match at a World Cup. For that cohort, Italy’s identity is mediated through highlights, archives and narratives rather than direct emotional experience.
This is where absence begins to translate into long-term impact.
From a business perspective, this dynamic can be understood as a form of customer acquisition and retention challenge.
Football fandom, like many forms of brand affinity, is often established early and reinforced through repeated emotional moments. Major tournaments play a disproportionate role in that process because they create high-intensity, shared experiences that are difficult to replicate in other contexts.
By missing two consecutive World Cups, Italy has effectively removed itself from two full cycles of global fan acquisition.
During that same period:
These teams have not only competed. They have been seen, experienced and internalised by new audiences.
Italy has not.
The result is not simply a temporary loss of attention. It is a gradual shift in market share of emotional loyalty.
Historically, Italy possessed a form of intangible competitive advantage that extended beyond tactics or personnel. The team carried a psychological weight: a perception of inevitability, resilience and tournament intelligence that influenced how opponents approached matches.
That advantage was, in effect, a form of brand equity.
In business terms, strong brands reduce friction. They shape expectations before the product is even experienced. They influence perception in ways that are not entirely rational.
But brand equity is not immune to inactivity.
As Italy’s presence in major tournaments has declined, that psychological aura has begun to weaken. Opponents no longer encounter Italy as a constant reference point in the competitive landscape. Instead, they encounter a team that appears intermittently, without the reinforcing effect of recent high-stakes performances.
The shift is subtle, but important. It represents a movement from:
And in competitive environments, episodic relevance rarely sustains long-term advantage.
Italy’s situation is further complicated by the role of nostalgia.
The country’s football identity is deeply intertwined with iconic moments, stylistic associations and a broader cultural aesthetic that extends beyond sport. This gives the brand unusual depth. It is not only supported by results, but by symbolism.
However, nostalgia can create a form of strategic inertia.
When a brand is strongly associated with past success, there is a tendency to assume that its relevance is self-sustaining. The historical narrative becomes a substitute for continuous renewal. Internally, this can lead to a misalignment between perception and reality: a belief that the brand remains as influential as it once was, even as external visibility declines.
In business contexts, this pattern is often observed in legacy companies that overestimate the durability of their market position. The risk is not immediate collapse, but gradual marginalisation.
Italy’s prolonged absence from the World Cup suggests a similar dynamic may be at play.
One of the more underappreciated aspects of Italy’s situation is the possibility of a self-reinforcing cycle.
Absence from major tournaments does not only reduce visibility. It can also influence the conditions that determine future performance.
This creates a loop in which absence contributes to further absence.
In business terms, this resembles a negative network effect. Instead of scale reinforcing growth, declining presence reinforces further decline.
Breaking such a cycle typically requires not only operational improvement, but a deliberate re-establishment of visibility.
The existence of earlier internal diagnoses, such as the report produced by Roberto Baggio for the Italian Football Federation, adds another layer to the analysis.
From a sporting perspective, the report is often cited as evidence that structural issues were identified well in advance. From a business perspective, it illustrates a more general organisational pattern: the gap between insight and execution.
Many institutions are capable of recognising emerging risks. Fewer are able to act on them with sufficient speed and consistency to prevent long-term consequences. In Italy’s case, the prolonged absence from the World Cup can be interpreted as the visible outcome of that gap.
It is not simply that problems existed. It is that they were not resolved in time to preserve continuous presence in the market.
Italy’s situation can therefore be understood across two overlapping timelines.
In the short term, the impact is measurable through obvious indicators: missed tournaments, lost revenue opportunities, reduced exposure for sponsors and diminished media attention. These effects are significant, but they are also relatively visible and widely discussed.
In the longer term, the implications are more subtle and potentially more important.
They involve:
These are not immediate losses. They accumulate gradually, often without clear inflection points. By the time they become fully visible, they are difficult to reverse quickly.
This is why absence can be more damaging than underperformance. Poor results still generate presence. Absence removes it entirely.
Italy’s recent history is often analysed through the lens of footballing decisions, tactical evolution or institutional governance. Those factors matter, but they do not fully capture the broader significance of the situation.
At its core, this is a story about what happens when a high-equity brand is no longer consistently present in its primary marketplace.
In business, sustained success depends not only on product quality, but on continuous participation in the environments where value is created and reinforced. Brands that fail to appear, even temporarily, risk being replaced in the minds of their audience by those that do.
Italy has not ceased to exist as a football identity. It remains one of the most recognisable names in the sport. But recognition alone is not sufficient to maintain relevance.
Relevance requires presence.
If the current trajectory were to continue, the long-term risk for Italy would not be a permanent decline in quality. It would be a shift in category.
The brand could move from being:
to being:
That transition is subtle, but profound. It changes how the brand is experienced, how it is valued, and how it competes for attention.
In many industries, once a brand becomes primarily associated with its past, reversing that perception requires significant effort and time. It is not impossible, but it is rarely automatic.
Italy’s failure to qualify for recent World Cups is often described as a sporting disappointment. It is that. But it is also something more structural.
Over a twelve-year period, Italy has missed the most important recurring moment of visibility in global football. In doing so, it has not only lost matches or tournaments. It has interrupted the continuous reinforcement of its own identity.
In business terms, absence is rarely neutral.
It creates space. And in competitive markets, that space is usually filled by others.
The question for Italy is therefore not only how to return to the World Cup. It is how to restore continuous presence before absence begins to redefine what the brand represents.
A. Strulak writes on sports business, commercial strategy and the economics of rights. Vinciamo Sports, Sport. Reimagined.
More Insight
Bayern Munich and the NHL just signed a partnership with no disclosed money in it. That is exactly what makes it interesting.
Read article →Talent is rarely the scarce resource in sport. The system capable of finding, developing and retaining it usually is.
Read article →Why a century of accumulated meaning is becoming football's scarcest commercial asset, and how one club is building that asset from scratch.
Read article →